← Insights

The Method That Got You Here Won't Get You There

The strategy that helped you save your first $10,000 won't help you save your first $1 million. Most people don't get stuck from lack of effort — they get stuck using an early-stage playbook in a later-stage game.

The Method That Got You Here Won't Get You There

From Living Paycheck to Paycheck to Writing About Wealth

A book titled The Wealth Ladder resting on a wooden desk

Nick Maggiulli is now the chief operating officer and data scientist at a well-known wealth management firm, but at six years old, his parents divorced and declared bankruptcy. He remembers his mother buying off-brand goods, going without internet for stretches, and never owning a car through high school. He later attended college on financial aid and worked his way up by continually adjusting his approach. The framework in his latest book, The Wealth Ladder, was built directly out of that lived experience.

Three Ways People Relate to Money

The book draws a sharp distinction: people who only focus on saving tend to get trapped in penny-pinching. People obsessed with the numbers themselves — net worth, investment returns — end up measuring their self-worth by a spreadsheet. But the people who go the furthest care less about the money itself and more about what they accomplished through it: what they learned, what they overcame, what they built. Money was never the goal. It's a tool.

Every Level Is a Different Game

Maggiulli's core framework divides household net worth — assets minus liabilities — into six levels, each roughly ten times the last. Level 1 is under $10,000, essentially living paycheck to paycheck. Level 2, $10,000 to $100,000, brings what he calls grocery freedom — not worrying about prices at the store. Level 3, $100,000 to $1 million, brings restaurant freedom. Level 4, $1 million to $10 million, brings travel freedom. Level 5, $10 million to $100 million, brings house freedom. Level 6, above $100 million, brings the freedom to genuinely change other people's lives.

The real point of the framework isn't the dollar amounts — it's that the method that works at each level is completely different. Climbing from Level 1 to Level 2 is mostly about raising income and skills; cutting expenses only goes so far. By Level 3, serious investing, compounding, and tax efficiency start to matter. But past Level 4, saving plus index investing alone barely moves the needle — plenty of households stay stuck at Level 4 for twenty years, not from lack of effort, but because climbing further usually requires business ownership or taking on meaningfully more leverage. The method that got your first $10,000 won't get you your first $1 million.

A Simple Rule for Judging Spending

The book offers one very concrete tool: divide your net worth by 10,000, and the resulting number is roughly what you can spend extra each day without it mattering. At $100,000 net worth, that's about $10 a day. At $1 million, it's $100. The point isn't to actually spend that amount daily — it's a reference point for judging whether a given purchase is genuinely a small deal for you right now. And the benchmark is net worth, not monthly income, because income fluctuates while net worth stays relatively stable, making it a steadier basis for long-term decisions.

Slipping Back a Level Is Normal — Just Don't Stop Completely

Climbing this ladder was never meant to be a straight line. The book is candid that anyone can slip back a level after a job loss or a medical emergency, and that's not a sign your strategy failed. What matters is understanding where you actually stand right now and making the right call from there — slow progress still compounds over time.

That's also why the book pushes back against rigid savings rules — whether it's the traditional "save 10%" or the more aggressive "save 50%" — treating them as fixed law. The better approach is proportional: invest more when you have more room, less when money is tight, but don't stop entirely just because this month is harder. Consistency matters more than the size of any single contribution.

Winning the Lottery Doesn't Always Feel Like Winning

The book offers a striking comparison: receiving the same amount of money through a lottery win versus earning it by building something feels completely different internally. The thrill of winning tends to fade fast — once it's spent on a car, a trip, everything on the wish list — and the account often ends up empty with nothing left to show for it. Someone who earned that same amount step by step, on the other hand, carries a sense of accomplishment that far outlasts the money itself. That's also why people eager to flaunt how much they have are often the least secure internally — all they have is a cold number, no story behind it. The people who've actually gone the distance can tell you exactly how they got there, what they overcame, and what they learned along the way.

Stacks of cash arranged like ascending steps leading toward sunlight

No Matter the Level, the Discipline Never Changes

The method changes constantly as you climb from Level 1 to Level 6 — from raising income, to serious investing, to owning a business or taking on real leverage. But one thing stays exactly the same the entire way through: the discipline of continuing to invest. It was never about how much you put in at any given moment — it's about whether you keep doing it within whatever your means allow, without stopping completely just because money is tight or the market looks rough. That's the whole spirit of dollar cost averaging: invest more when you can, less when you can't, but keep going. Consistency is what actually gives compounding a chance to work.

Concepts summarized from Nick Maggiulli's book The Wealth Ladder (2025).

從月光族到財富作家的路

一本名為《The Wealth Ladder》的書放在木桌上

Nick Maggiulli現在是一家知名財富管理公司的營運長兼數據分析師,但他六歲那年,父母離婚、家裡宣告破產。他記得母親買的是雜牌商品,家裡有段時間沒有網路,高中畢業前他從沒擁有過一輛車。後來他靠獎學金念了大學,一路透過調整策略,爬到今天的位置。他在最新的著作《財富階梯》裡提出的框架,正是從這段親身經歷裡整理出來的。

三種面對金錢的方式

書裡有一個很直接的分類:只會存錢的人,容易陷入斤斤計較;只盯著數字、用存款餘額和投資報酬率來衡量自己價值的人,容易變得對金錢過度痴迷;但真正走得遠的人,看重的不是金錢本身,而是透過金錢完成了什麼——學到了什麼、克服了什麼困境、創造了什麼成果。金錢從來不是目的,是一種工具。

每個階段,玩的是不同的遊戲

Maggiulli提出的核心框架,是把家庭淨資產(總資產減去負債)分成六個階梯,每一階大約相差十倍:第一階是不到一萬美元,等於月光族;第二階是一萬到十萬美元,達到「超市自由」,買菜不用看價格;第三階是十萬到一百萬美元,達到「餐廳自由」;第四階是一百萬到一千萬美元,達到「旅行自由」;第五階是一千萬到一億美元,達到「房子自由」;第六階是一億美元以上,達到能真正影響他人生活的「行善自由」。

這個框架真正的重點,不是財富本身有多少,是每一階能用的方法完全不一樣。從第一階爬到第二階,重點是提高收入和技能,精打細算省錢的效果有限;到了第三階,才開始真正需要認真投資、善用複利、優化稅務;但過了第四階,光靠存錢加上買指數基金,幾乎爬不動了——很多家庭卡在第四階二十年都沒能往上,不是不夠努力,是需要換一套完全不同的方法,通常得靠擁有事業所有權,或是承擔更高槓桿的資產。讓你存到第一個一萬美元的方法,不會幫你存到第一個一百萬美元。

一個簡單好記的花錢判斷法

書裡提供了一個很具體的工具:把你的淨資產除以一萬,得到的數字,就是你每天可以「無痛」多花的錢。淨資產十萬美元,代表每天多花十美元不會影響你的財務狀況;淨資產一百萬美元,這個數字就變成一百美元。這不是叫你每天真的把這筆錢花掉,是用來判斷「這筆花費對現在的我來說,算不算一件小事」的參考標準——而且判斷基準是淨資產,不是每個月的薪水,因為薪水會波動,淨資產相對穩定,更適合當作長期決策的依據。

退階是正常的,重點是別完全停下來

爬這個階梯,從來不是一條直線。書裡也坦白承認,任何人都可能因為失業、醫療緊急狀況,暫時退回上一階,這是正常現象,不代表你的策略失敗了。真正重要的,是理解自己現在站在哪一階,然後做出對應的決定——緩慢的進展,一樣會隨著時間累積複利效果。

這也是為什麼書裡明確反對死板的儲蓄規則——不管是傳統的「存10%」,還是更激進的「存50%」,都不該是一成不變的鐵律。真正該做的,是量力而為:手頭寬裕的時候多投入一點,手頭緊的時候少投入一點,但不要因為這個月比較緊,就乾脆完全停止投入。持續,比金額大小更重要。

中彩券的人,未必覺得自己成功

書裡有一個很值得思考的對比:同樣拿到一筆錢,中彩券的人跟靠自己創業賺到這筆錢的人,內心的滿足感完全不同。中獎帶來的喜悅通常很短暫,一旦拿去買車、旅行、把想要的東西全買下來,戶頭歸零之後,往往什麼都沒留下;但靠自己一步步賺到這筆錢的人,心裡留下的成就感遠遠超過金錢本身。這也解釋了為什麼那些急著炫耀自己有多少錢的人,往往才是內心最不踏實的——因為除了冷冰冰的數字,他們沒有故事可以說。真正走得遠的人,講得出自己怎麼走過來的,克服了什麼、學到了什麼。

一疊疊現金排列成階梯狀,通向陽光

不管在哪一階,紀律永遠是同一件事

從第一階爬到第六階,方法會一路變化——從提高收入,到認真投資,到擁有事業或更高槓桿的資產。但貫穿整個過程、從頭到尾都不會變的一件事,是持續投入的紀律。不管現在能投入的金額是多是少,重點從來不是一次拿出多少錢,是願不願意在能力範圍內,一直做下去,不因為短期手頭緊、或市場一時不好看,就整個停下來。這正是定期定額的精神——錢多的時候多投一點,錢少的時候少投一點,但持續,才是真正讓複利有機會發揮作用的關鍵。

內容整理自 Nick Maggiulli 的著作《The Wealth Ladder》(2025年出版)。

Voice